Ocean Currents » restoration plan http://blog.oceanconservancy.org News, opinions, photos and facts from Ocean Conservancy Fri, 27 May 2016 15:06:23 +0000 en-US hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.2 High Five to the RESTORE Council! http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2014/07/25/high-five-to-the-restore-council/ http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2014/07/25/high-five-to-the-restore-council/#comments Sat, 26 Jul 2014 00:55:48 +0000 Kara Lankford http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/?p=8832

In order to successfully restore the Gulf of Mexico from the BP Deepwater Horizon oil disaster, Ocean Conservancy, as you may recall, has a tried-and-true Recipe for Restoration:

1 part science

1 part public engagement

1 part clear criteria for decision-making

We are so pleased today to see that the RESTORE Council is following our recipe for success. As the federal and state partnership charged with determining how billion of dollars in Clean Water Act fines will be spent, the RESTORE Council announced their plans today for receiving and evaluating proposals for Gulf restoration projects. This long-awaited announcement has been years in the making, and Ocean Conservancy has been one of the strongest supporters for a science-based platform for successful Gulf restoration. Thanks to the actions taken by the Council today, projects to restore the Gulf will be chosen based on merit, not on politics.
 The Council lays out a five-step process for project selection. Projects and programs that meet these criteria will be included in a draft prioritized list, known as the Funded Priorities List. The Council’s process will accomplish the following:

1.     Proposes focus areas of restoring habitat and water quality for projects and programs which will be included on the Funded Priorities List as the first addendum to the Initial Comprehensive Plan.

2.     Encourages project submissions that emphasize the following:

    • How a project is foundational in the sense that the project forms the initial core steps in addressing a significant ecosystem issue and that future projects can be tiered to substantially increase the benefits;
    • How a project will be sustainable over time;
    • Why a project is likely to succeed; and
    • How a project benefits the human community where implementation occurs.

3.     Provides for external independent scientific review of project proposals.

4.     Ensures that all applicable environmental compliance requirements are addressed.

5.     Ensures that projects meet both statutory requirements and commitments the Council made in the Comprehensive Plan.

Ocean Conservancy applauds the Council for seeking external scientific review of project proposals. This is so important to ensure that Gulf restoration projects are based on the best available science. We are also pleased to hear that they are committed to a transparent process, with projects coordinated across state lines. After all, fish don’t observe state lines underwater!

We commend the Council for their dedication and perseverance to accomplish the enormous task of restoring the Gulf, not just from the BP oil disaster, but also from decades of environmental disasters. The process outlined by the Council may not be perfect, but it will help guide restoration toward a comprehensive, ecosystem-wide approach to Gulf restoration. There is still much work to do and many more hurdles to jump, but today was certainly a victory. Let’s take time to celebrate this win. High five!

http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2014/07/25/high-five-to-the-restore-council/feed/ 7
No Truth in Advertising: BP Avoiding Gulf Restoration http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2013/08/22/no-truth-in-advertising-bp-avoiding-gulf-restoration/ http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2013/08/22/no-truth-in-advertising-bp-avoiding-gulf-restoration/#comments Thu, 22 Aug 2013 18:47:24 +0000 Bethany Kraft http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/?p=6554 Boom and pelicans in the Gulf of Mexico

Photo © Cheryl Gerber / Ocean Conservancy

Have you seen the BP commercials about the company taking responsibility for the worst oil disaster in U.S. history? I for one usually see at least one every week. That’s because for the past three years, the company has spent hundreds of millions on advertising trying to clean up their image. But unfortunately, BP hasn’t been as diligent about spending money to actually clean up the impacts of the Deepwater Horizon disaster they claim to be taking responsibility for.

Even as their advertisements continue to run on air, BP is now fighting its own settlement and refusing to provide much-needed funding to the people impacted by the disaster and to restoration efforts critical to bring back the health of Gulf ecosystems and marine life.

Why? Because BP claims that the people who lost their jobs and their way of life are trying to scam the company. This despite the fact that while BP makes about $4 billion in profit every three months, many people who lost their livelihoods have waited more than three years to receive compensation for their losses.

Instead of taking responsibility for the oil disaster in the Gulf and all of the repercussions to the people and wildlife who call the Gulf region home, BP is going out of its way to shirk responsibility for paying economic claims they already agreed to in court.

Now BP is taking a step even further by suing the U.S. government, claiming that being barred from pursuing new federal contracts (keep in mind that this was part of the punishment the company received for the oil disaster in the first place) is potentially costing them billions of dollars.

Despite BP’s completely astonishing legal maneuvers recently, there is progress being made. This week the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council released its Comprehensive Restoration Plan. Ocean Conservancy (and about a thousand of our supporters—thank you!) provided comments on what the plan should include to ensure that restoration is truly comprehensive. Read more about our recommendations here.

RESTORE Act funding is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to do something great for the Gulf. The task before the council is to use the plan as a blueprint to guide the development of a science-based process to ensure that projects ultimately selected for funding will contribute to a vision for comprehensive restoration of the Gulf ecosystem from coastal areas to the marine environment.

But a plan is only as good as the funds to implement it. As the news reports regarding BP continue to come out—detailing their court battles over settlement payments to oil spill estimate—one thing is for sure: We need to ensure the communities and livelihoods that were damaged by this disaster get the resources they need to recover. Restoring the Gulf to health after decades of degradation, including, most recently, the BP oil disaster, will ensure that we enjoy these benefits for many years to come.

We look forward to the council meeting next week and sharing our insight with members regarding what is now needed to get the plan to a place where it can be funded and implemented.

http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2013/08/22/no-truth-in-advertising-bp-avoiding-gulf-restoration/feed/ 8
Ocean Conservancy’s Recipe for Gulf Restoration http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2013/05/29/ocean-conservancys-recipe-for-gulf-restoration/ http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2013/05/29/ocean-conservancys-recipe-for-gulf-restoration/#comments Wed, 29 May 2013 20:00:41 +0000 Bethany Kraft http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/?p=5902

credit — NOAA

Restoring the environment is a lot like planning what to cook. A coral reef restoration project and a pie both have a recipe for success. Using a good plan, or recipe, helps to create a product we can’t possibly pull off by ourselves. My latest culinary triumph, a delicious (if I do say so myself) chocolate silk pie made from a recipe featured in a cooking magazine, looked tantalizing, but frighteningly labor intensive. Because it had a lot of detailed steps, I was nervous about making a mistake and ruining some pretty expensive ingredients, but in the end I took the plunge. Unfortunately, the RESTORE Act Council has not taken the plunge into creating a detailed recipe for restoration of the Gulf of Mexico. It is still missing some important ingredients.

Developing a comprehensive restoration plan for the Gulf of Mexico is not unlike baking a chocolate silk pie. It’s complicated. There are a lot of steps, the ingredients and the sequence you incorporate them matters, and the preparation is just as important as the baking itself. I couldn’t just go to the Piggly Wiggly and throw stuff in the cart. Leaving out key ingredients is the surest way to sorrow. You avoid disaster by having a detailed plan. If you pay attention to the recipe and ensure that you have everything you need on hand, you can tackle pretty much anything and be reasonably confident of an edible outcome.

But even with a great recipe, things only got more complicated when I tied on my apron and started cooking. I invariably found a step that I missed, and was forced to adapt on the fly, which was why I ended up melting chocolate on the stove with one hand and beating a heated egg concoction with the other. In the meantime, my freshly whipped cream melted on the counter. Even the best laid plans go awry, but adaptation is key. (Stay with me, I’ve almost exhausted this particular metaphor.)

Last week, the Gulf Coast Ecosystem Restoration Council released their Draft Initial Comprehensive Plan. The ingredients to cook up comprehensive restoration are in the plan, but the actual steps to achieve the goals and priorities of the plan are lacking in many areas. We need specific details about how we are going to restore the resources we rely on for our food, fun and livelihoods. RESTORE Act funding is a once in a lifetime opportunity to do something great for the Gulf. We have one Gulf and one chance to make sure our restoration recipe is the best it can possibly be.

Ocean Conservancy’s recipe for comprehensive restoration calls for:
1 Part Science
1 Part Public Engagement
1 Part Clear Criteria for Decision-making

Science and adaptive management are the core ingredients of a successful restoration program. The Council must use the best science on the shelf to help guide their decisions. While some of the science needed already exists and just needs to be put into the cart, some of it will need to be created from scratch and the Council should make sure the resources to create it are available.

The Council also needs a Head Chef, or a Chief Scientist. This senior-level position can advise the Council and provide guidance and feedback on restoration as a whole and for individual projects. And the final decision on what goes into the recipe for restoration should be guided by a clear set of criteria.

Although there can sometimes be too many cooks in the kitchen, it is important to learn from those who have spent lots of hours in the kitchen. This is why it is so important to infuse meaningful public engagement throughout the process. Advanced notice of meetings open to the public, opportunities for public comment on draft strategies, plans and projects is essential.

Finally, folding in a comprehensive approach to restoration will make sure all of our hard work results in a dish we can all be proud of. The final plan must be an integrated, regional approach and contain specific objectives. Detailed information on how progress will be monitored must be clear as well. Sound objectives and clear ways to measure effectiveness of projects are essential to making sure the plan addresses restoration of both coastal and marine ecosystems, as well as coastal communities.

For more details on our initial recommendations, click here.

Oh, and if you want that chocolate silk pie recipe, you can find it here.

http://blog.oceanconservancy.org/2013/05/29/ocean-conservancys-recipe-for-gulf-restoration/feed/ 5