Will radiation from Fukushima harm distant seafood consumers?

Pacific bluefin tuna. Photo courtesy of NOAA Fisheries.

I’ve been receiving questions from concerned friends and family about how radiation from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant is affecting the marine environment and human seafood consumption. As ocean lovers, I’m sure you’re equally concerned. After reading different scientific articles and speaking with experts, I found that there are local impacts from radiation to humans and marine life around Fukushima – but impacts from radiation on the rest of the Pacific Ocean are not expected to be harmful to human consumers and marine animals.

Human tragedy and nuclear power plant meltdown

The Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami in Japan in March 2011 was a human tragedy, killing at least 15,550 people and displacing more than 130,000 people. Economic losses caused by the magnitude-9.0 earthquake and the resulting tsunami in Japan came to $210 billion, making it the costliest natural catastrophe of all time. This event also triggered the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant meltdown, creating a radiation scare around the world. The plant released radiation from:

  • atmospheric deposition due to the meltdown during mid-March 2011;
  • direct discharge from the plant;
  • river runoff; and
  • contaminated underground water flow.

The latter three sources are now small and continuous sources of input. These pathways introduced mostly iodine-131, cesium-137 and cesium-134 but also low levels of tellurium, uranium and strontium to the area surrounding the power plant.

Local radiation impacts: fishery closures, leaking storage tanks, elevated cancer rates

Radiation from the plant is impacting the area near the disaster. In local coastal waters and bottom sediments near Fukushima, cesium levels for certain marine life, such as bottom-dwelling fish, have been above the Japanese government’s limits for seafood and have prompted local fishery closures and nearby countries to ban importing fish caught near Fukushima. Direct exposure to leaking nuclear waste storage tanks is causing health problems among plant workers. The power plant meltdown also likely caused higher rates of certain cancers – which will unfold in the years to come – in local residents.

Distant radiation impacts: no harm likely to marine animals and human consumers of seafood

The implications for the larger Pacific Ocean, however, will be much less deleterious. In the Pacific Ocean, currents, eddies and other physical ocean dynamics dilute radiation from Fukushima, making these concentrations much lower in the ocean with distance and time. While the overall concentration of radionuclides will increase in the Pacific Ocean from pre-Fukushima levels, the increased levels will not likely be enough to be harmful to marine animals and human consumers outside the local area.

For example, migratory Pacific bluefin tuna, traveling from Japan to California, had elevated radiation levels of cesium-134 in 2012, a year after the Fukushima accident, but these levels were below safety guidelines for public health and less than half those from 2011.

To understand health risks, scientists also calculated that the additional dose from Fukushima radionuclides to humans consuming tainted Pacific bluefin tuna in the United States was 0.9 and 4.7 μSv for average consumers and subsistence fishermen, respectively. Such radiation doses are comparable to, or less than, the dose all humans routinely obtain from naturally occurring radionuclides in many food items, medical treatments or air travel. (From a sustainable seafood perspective, Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch recommends avoiding bluefin tuna since they are being caught faster than they can reproduce.) With more scientific research, we can better understand how radioactivity from Fukushima will affect marine life and the food chain.

Dr. Ken Buesseler, senior scientist at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, has been studying the spread and impacts of radiation from Fukushima into the Pacific Ocean. He has an analogy to help understand the movement of Fukushima-derived radiation as it enters the ocean:

“The spread of cesium once it enters the ocean can be understood by the analogy of mixing cream into coffee. At first, they are separate and distinguishable, but just as we start to stir the cream forms long, narrow filaments or streaks in the water. The streaks became longer and narrower as they moved off shore, where diffusive processes began to homogenize and dilute the radionuclides. In the ocean, diffusion is helped along by ocean eddies, squirts, and jets that broaden, mix, and continue to dilute the cesium as it travels across the ocean. With distance and time, radionuclide concentrations become much lower in the ocean, something that our measurements confirm.”

For more information regarding the Fukushima nuclear power plant and radiation, check out Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution’s special series on Fukushima. For more information on sustainable seafood choices, visit Monterey Bay Aquarium Seafood Watch.

39 comments
alsigirl
alsigirl

Media is blocked from reporting. I personally know of a case where a visitor to Seattle ate seafood on the waterfront; the first bite went down like a ball of fire and she was rushed immediately to a hospital where her stomach was pumped. That was before Thanksgiving. Now she's lost her hair and is still not well. There were other cases at the time, all fatal. A mutual friend is paranoid and won't discuss it by email.

taylordavidg
taylordavidg

You lost me with "Dr. Ken Buesseler"

 

Fraud.

Henry Hauch
Henry Hauch

What's perhaps most troubling is the lack of transparency in US fishery management with extreme special interest groups being given undue influence on Policy. Of coarse that is also true of the EPA. This is not "Corporate America" as many would expect but eNGO's.

Henry Hauch
Henry Hauch

Scientist still confirm that radiation from the Japanese Reactor when it is traceable in Western Pacific Seafood is at levels much less than natural background radiation. Every living thing contains "Radiation", and 99.99% is naturally occurring.

ChristopherLybarger
ChristopherLybarger

Achieve Special health articles! There are a good number of current health articles are found in the online that are easily accessible and these articles are really helpful for the people who are really concern about their health.

Edgar Alejandre
Edgar Alejandre

I believe it's not a question of if it will but how long before all sea life begins to actually suffer from the effects of the radiation unless it already is and no one tells us about it . Whatever it is , we must contribute to finding ways of protecting our waters and animals before things get worst !

Heather Young
Heather Young

I do think this deserves more coverage and transparency. This is a global issue so it should get global resources. It is really concerning that this article did NOT admit the plant is still seeping tons of water daily????

Zach Windholz
Zach Windholz

What cumulative effects are there on sessile organism that are planktonic feeders? What about reef ecosystems?

Kasey MacRae
Kasey MacRae

Drew Harrington what were talking about earlier!

Donald Smith
Donald Smith

Still radiation added by man to the food chain

Punny Mann
Punny Mann

Effect takes place later. By all means anyone whom feels confident consuming food from this region go ahead.

Tina Fay
Tina Fay

Scientists already know the truth... Read the article people!

David Owen
David Owen

tracie, we do too ingest radiation released from burning coal.

Punny Mann
Punny Mann

Great topic .I think this issue should be brought to the media forefront.Discussion is key in finding the truth on this subject.

Tracie Counts
Tracie Counts

Coal pollution is more of an air quality problem .I'm speaking about water quality. The media will never warn you until it's way too late .Truth is scarier than fiction and they only want to scare you to the store for milk and tp . No use letting people know anything if they can't profit from it .Just saying.

David Owen
David Owen

I love that Tracy quotes monster conspiracy theorist Alex Jones on a science board and people are too tepid to even call her on it.

David Owen
David Owen

coal contributes about 10,000 times more radiation than Fukushima every year. why don't the rabid radiophobes propagate some anti-coal stuff for a change?

Tracie Counts
Tracie Counts

They lied it's still leaking three years later .Duck tape and homeless people hired at the plant are the fix .

Tracie Counts
Tracie Counts

Starfish are melting, dolphins are dying .Sardines are missing .Coral is dying .Oil on top of radiation .Once it hits land then the crops are affected .I wonder if California raisons are safe anymore?

Sasha ZsaZsa K
Sasha ZsaZsa K

If you want to be a sheeple, believe the lies from those people. I for one, will not consume, preventing my own doom. Hahahaha. Redic poem right? Who gives a shit! I'm NOT eating it and don't suggest you do. ♥ to all

Tracie Counts
Tracie Counts

Is it safe to eat tilapia from China sold from a company in the USA.

Tracie Counts
Tracie Counts

Alex Jones tested San Francisco last week and they are saying radiation has been off the charts in that area.

David Myers
David Myers

There is absolutely no definitive proof of high radiation levels away from point of disaster. . And loads off proof no threat across the pacific to US west coast

Sheri Terry
Sheri Terry

Yes, I'm off the pacific and also completely off seafood for the time being. We have independent research indicating up to 90 increase in radiation and other pockets with little to none. I do understand higher elevation will also raise the readings but not to the extent we're seeing. I suggest we do more research and not from the boob tube, they're deceiving you.

Melissa Chiotis
Melissa Chiotis

Hell yes, it can very well destroy the oceans food chain

David Myers
David Myers

No scientist have tested radiation throughout the waste field and no above normal levels have been detected. As it has migrated across ocean